# Card 4: Startup Valuation Disconnect

> AI startup valuations have detached from revenue fundamentals, echoing the excesses of the dot-com era.

## Fact

- OpenAI is valued at $840B with $25B in ARR (~34x revenue multiple) — though IPO projections suggest 12-16x *(Source: aibusiness.vc, May 2026)*
- Anthropic reached a $900B valuation (~180x estimated revenue) in May 2026 — approximately 500x more than traditional SaaS multiples *(Source: aibusiness.vc, May 2026)*
- Revenue multiples for AI startups range from 100x to 500x, far exceeding dot-com era peaks of 50-100x *(Source: PitchBook/CB Insights data)*
- Burn rates are enormous: OpenAI alone has consumed over $7B in funding while pursuing path to profitability *(Source: public filings and media reports)*

![](mini_startup_multiples.png)

## Impact

- **Valuation detached from fundamentals**: Revenue multiples of 100-500x are unsustainable. Even at explosive growth rates, these valuations require decades of hyper-growth to justify.
- **Crash risk if growth disappoints**: If AI adoption slows or open-source alternatives erode margins, valuation corrections could be severe — potentially 80-90% like the dot-com bust.
- **Investor concentration risk**: A handful of mega-deals dominate AI funding. If these companies fail to deliver, the entire AI investment ecosystem faces systemic risk.

## Act

- **When debating AI startup valuations**: Compare to dot-com era multiples. The NASDAQ fell 78% from its 2000 peak — even companies that survived were decimated.
- **Key question to ask**: "At 180x revenue, how many years of current revenue would Anthropic need to generate to justify its valuation?"
- **Counter-argument anticipation**: "AI companies will grow into their valuations." Response: This was the same argument during the dot-com bubble. Most companies didn't grow into their valuations — they crashed.

---

*Last updated: 2026-06-05 | Sources: aibusiness.vc, PitchBook/CB Insights, Public filings*
